Evaluating research
In an information-rich society we are bombarded with press releases about the latest research, consumer market surveys, crime statistics, health studies, public opinion polls and new advances in technology.
How can we tell the good research from the poorer research? How can we, for instance, tell the difference between credible research and cleverly disguised marketing?
As an organisation that commissions, collates and analyses research that can be used to advise government, the Families Commission has a vested interest to ensure that research is reported accurately. The following checklist will help to determine the quality or appropriateness of the research.
A simple checklist for evaluating research
Reprinted with the kind permission of Research First
| Dimension | Ask yourself | Details to check |
|---|---|---|
| Face value |
What do the results say? |
|
| Context | What do other studies have to say about this issue? |
|
| Motivation | Who did the research and why? |
|
| Quality | How do the researchers know the things they claim? |
|
| Philosophical | Has the research addressed common sources of bias? |
How have the researchers avoided common biases such as:
|
Remember:
- Always be wary if you cannot get access to the original research questionnaire, data coding schedule, and the raw data
- Be wary of research that concludes with the call for more research.
Research Companies in New Zealand
The Market Research Society of New Zealand is the professional body for the market research industry. A list of member organisations is available on their website.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| A simple checklist for evaluating research (PDF) | 254.35 KB |



